I'll talk about demagoguery and injustice socially frowned upon, relating to privileges absurd to "disadvantaged groups". I invite the extremists to abandon this post before freírme to criticism, or failing to read well my arguments without taking their torches. Thanks Before you start on the new studies, I was battling to úlltimo moment to enroll. The reason is that it is something very demanding in relation to the few places that offer, and was one of the top of the reserve list. The entrance from the average grade in high school, so that the first access would have the most note, and the list would be completed to meet the quota.
When I went to see who were admitted and saw my was left at the gates, many people reassured me not to worry, that being so close to end up going because lists are always between application and registration. The problem is that the last-in, in front of me, was much less notice me, and that was not going to tolerate.
I went to talk with the secretary to see what happened, whether it was a mistake or for some reason had preferential treatment, and then I knew that it was the square reserved for people with a disability of any kind. And I wonder: Why, if someone has less qualifications than me, and intends to move at the same level, you must play with an advantage? Does not matter I have a better record
because she is on crutches? I do not understand. In the workplace, things are otherwise: Since it is much more comfortable hiring people "without problems", in order to not have to be adapting jobs to the disabled of any kind, there are tax measures to encourage employers to hire them, particularly succulent subsidies that make them lose their initial fears.
also pursued discriminatory measures such as fire women who become pregnant, or forcing the non-existence of architectural barriers. I think it's great and I consider it unethical and totally necessary. It is sensational. But that's the world of work privileges in the academic world have no meaning, because they involve belittling those who did deserve them.
If you're starting a higher education, no one stops to look if you're missing an arm or you are lame. If you get the score needed to enter, enter, and if not, do not. As logical as that. Or it should. One thing is that the center has the necessary measures to address the special needs of certain students (to be), and another is that they have to work less to get what I do. Call me a bad person, but I do not
seem fair. In my school there was a boy in chair wheels was a good student, was more advanced than me, and I know it's because drew good marks. It is logical and no one takes the credit. Should be given special treatment and be more lenient with him? Should we require less expensive to get the title? Of course not! If you have the same ability to study the whole world, the inability to move the legs is quite secondary. Or not? can not advocate for a society in which they tear down all barriers to disabled, then if we put others in harm others favor them. There is lack of consideration, but that justice should work the same in both directions.
In short and returning to my case if I have more notice and therefore did not support me, fuck me and go through with, if you fuck you upside down. Point.
PD. I wrote this post before school started, and now that person is my friend. We get along great and we went together every day, but I do not share the idea that by limping slightly from a leg (because that's what you have), would rise above others with more note. What can not be, can not be.
0 comments:
Post a Comment