recently spoke of the incompetent , a teacher more useless than a playmobil elbow. I left something on the drawing board felt it had to be a post by itself: The unique combination of ignorance, complexity and lack of common sense that led him to speak according to the fashion stupid politically correct and grammatically incorrect ... . As I stated once here, the politically correct language touches me greatly balls, I think people's own fear of calling things by their name so as not to show their own prejudices. She is one of those people who sees people "of color" on the street, assumed that lesbians do not have a girlfriend or partner, but "partner", and especially and particularly, strength, anything that says to try to sneak the two genres without coming to story. Moreover, if you miss because it comes naturally, correcting for incorporation. Subnormal.
The other day I sent a work group and he replied, via e-mail, we had "fixed" terms "sexist", eliminating the gender-neutral to include both genders. We got both the balls that we went to the SAR and will reship the annex on the use of generic and mistakes that ultimately people carry out a post by cogérsela with cigarette paper. The next day they approached us and told us we were right, it was not wrong, but that she was a feminist, and therefore saw the
obligation to "fight on all fronts." You're not a feminist, you asshole and a leg.
The other day I sent a work group and he replied, via e-mail, we had "fixed" terms "sexist", eliminating the gender-neutral to include both genders. We got both the balls that we went to the SAR and will reship the annex on the use of generic and mistakes that ultimately people carry out a post by cogérsela with cigarette paper. The next day they approached us and told us we were right, it was not wrong, but that she was a feminist, and therefore saw the
obligation to "fight on all fronts." You're not a feminist, you asshole and a leg. For starters, if you want to use the two genres indiscriminately, you have to always or never do so, but stressed to death only when you remember is inconsistent. You are so fucking ridiculous that you choose to say things like "my father and my mother" instead of "my parents" or mention "the sons and daughters of my neighbors and my neighbors", just to two examples. Do not you realize how cumbersome it is and the ridiculous are you doing?
At this point, some might think I'm going through, but to give you an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat mental midget he is, and is resentful toward the male gender, provided that said notes or want to talk to us , first called all the girls, with whom he stops to chat at length, and the guys we left for the final, dedicated just a few crumbs of his time.
could write on the subject, which provides for long, but better I leave you with an article epic Perez-Reverte, which makes me ejaculate mass every time I reread. called "The audacity of ignorance" , and reads:
"An Andalusian parliamentary commission which was entrusted with reviewing the" sexist language "of the documents there, addressed to the Royal English Academy requesting a report on the correctness of the unfolding type 'deputies, parents, children, servants and officers' and so on. As usual, received five thousand hits a month worldwide, "said pointing SAR language that such stunts are unnecessary and that, despite the desire of certain groups to present language as social machismo historical hostage, the generic use of masculine grammatical has to do with the basic criterion of any language: economy and simplification. So, for maximum communication with the least effort possible, not saying four words which can be summarized in two. That is the reason that, in nouns designating animate beings, male use also designate all individuals of the species, regardless of gender. If we say the prehistoric men dressed in animal skins or in my neighborhood there are many cats, references are not excluded, of course, neither women nor prehistoric cats.
still detail in the response of the SAR, that is precisely the opposition of the sexes, when used, allows us to highlight specific differences . Use it indiscriminately, as proposed by radical feminists, meaning to take away that option when you really need. For example, to make clear that the proportion of pupils has been reversed, or that in a sport must share equally the male and female students. The loss of such nuances because of socio-political and non-linguistic factors and the use of circumlocutions and substitutions
inadequate is impoverishing, contrived and ridiculous : Members and elected deputies and elected members rather than elected, or to take children to school or take our offspring to school rather than take the fucking children to school. For example.
But all that is reasonable and is in the response of the Royal Academy, does not coincide with the wishes and intentions of the director of the Andalusian Women's Institute, Dona Soledad Ruiz. Upon hearing the report, Mrs. Ruiz complained bitterly and publicly. What makes the SAR, he said, "women invisible in language as rich as English, which is masculine and feminine." Then not smoked a cigar, I suppose, because smoking is not politically correct. But whatever. Apart from stress simplicity of the argument, and also the creation bold, at the risk of Mrs. Ruiz, the verb "invisible" stupidity-ignorance allied with eggs have everything, and forgive the sexist metaphor, "I think thing that requires some clarification. Or several.
Someone should tell some recalcitrant feminists, even those who are in the National Government or the Government of Andalusia, which are spoiled. The Royal Academy is an institution not improvised in two days, you need the votes of minorities and demagoguery easy to hold a legislature. SAR Nor is La Moncloa, where enough hysterical shrieks at the right time for the Prime Minister and Minister of Justice change in opportunistic demagoguery boasts the title of an act of violence against women or domestic violence by that idiocy gender violence without dislodging their heads in shame. The English language, from Homer, Seneca and Ben Cuzmar to Cela and Delibes, through Berceo, Cervantes, Quevedo and Valle Inclán, not something that was improvised or changed in four years, but a long cultural process curd for centuries, where no fool-illiterate or illiterate, has nothing to say
interest thread political conjuncture. The RAE, in concert with twenty-one other sister academies, is an independent, noble and respected around the world: manages and keeps alive, effective and common, a special language, educated, spoken by four million people. This task lasted for nearly three hundred years, and was never subject to the cocoon strategy shift policy, not even during the Franco era, when scholars refused to deprive them of their chairs to fellow Republicans in exile. So for once, without a precedent, let this article will sign today Arturo Perez-Reverte. Of the Royal English Academy. "
"An Andalusian parliamentary commission which was entrusted with reviewing the" sexist language "of the documents there, addressed to the Royal English Academy requesting a report on the correctness of the unfolding type 'deputies, parents, children, servants and officers' and so on. As usual, received five thousand hits a month worldwide, "said pointing SAR language that such stunts are unnecessary and that, despite the desire of certain groups to present language as social machismo historical hostage, the generic use of masculine grammatical has to do with the basic criterion of any language: economy and simplification. So, for maximum communication with the least effort possible, not saying four words which can be summarized in two. That is the reason that, in nouns designating animate beings, male use also designate all individuals of the species, regardless of gender. If we say the prehistoric men dressed in animal skins or in my neighborhood there are many cats, references are not excluded, of course, neither women nor prehistoric cats. still detail in the response of the SAR, that is precisely the opposition of the sexes, when used, allows us to highlight specific differences . Use it indiscriminately, as proposed by radical feminists, meaning to take away that option when you really need. For example, to make clear that the proportion of pupils has been reversed, or that in a sport must share equally the male and female students. The loss of such nuances because of socio-political and non-linguistic factors and the use of circumlocutions and substitutions
inadequate is impoverishing, contrived and ridiculous : Members and elected deputies and elected members rather than elected, or to take children to school or take our offspring to school rather than take the fucking children to school. For example. But all that is reasonable and is in the response of the Royal Academy, does not coincide with the wishes and intentions of the director of the Andalusian Women's Institute, Dona Soledad Ruiz. Upon hearing the report, Mrs. Ruiz complained bitterly and publicly. What makes the SAR, he said, "women invisible in language as rich as English, which is masculine and feminine." Then not smoked a cigar, I suppose, because smoking is not politically correct. But whatever. Apart from stress simplicity of the argument, and also the creation bold, at the risk of Mrs. Ruiz, the verb "invisible" stupidity-ignorance allied with eggs have everything, and forgive the sexist metaphor, "I think thing that requires some clarification. Or several.
Someone should tell some recalcitrant feminists, even those who are in the National Government or the Government of Andalusia, which are spoiled. The Royal Academy is an institution not improvised in two days, you need the votes of minorities and demagoguery easy to hold a legislature. SAR Nor is La Moncloa, where enough hysterical shrieks at the right time for the Prime Minister and Minister of Justice change in opportunistic demagoguery boasts the title of an act of violence against women or domestic violence by that idiocy gender violence without dislodging their heads in shame. The English language, from Homer, Seneca and Ben Cuzmar to Cela and Delibes, through Berceo, Cervantes, Quevedo and Valle Inclán, not something that was improvised or changed in four years, but a long cultural process curd for centuries, where no fool-illiterate or illiterate, has nothing to say
interest thread political conjuncture. The RAE, in concert with twenty-one other sister academies, is an independent, noble and respected around the world: manages and keeps alive, effective and common, a special language, educated, spoken by four million people. This task lasted for nearly three hundred years, and was never subject to the cocoon strategy shift policy, not even during the Franco era, when scholars refused to deprive them of their chairs to fellow Republicans in exile. So for once, without a precedent, let this article will sign today Arturo Perez-Reverte. Of the Royal English Academy. "
